An Introduction to Structural Movement and Cracking by Jen Lemen
What causes structural movement?
Buildings move all the time! Usually so slight or slowly though that the movement is not noticeable. The physical sign of structural movement is usually cracking to a building, externally and/or internally.
Movement can be caused by one or more reasons. These can be split into causes relating to the structure and causes relating to the ground.
Structural causes include:
- Shrinkage of building materials, such as when mortar, plaster or concrete (which all have a high water content) dry out and shrink
- Moisture or thermal (seasonal or weather-related) movement, causing building materials to contract or expand
- Poor workmanship or design detailing, e.g. removal of a chimney breast, overloaded floors or roof alterations
- Decay or deterioration of building fabric, e.g. rotten timbers
Ground-related causes include:
- Settlement, where foundations are too shallow or have insufficient load bearing capacity for the weight of the building
- Subsidence, where the ground beneath the building is unstable. For example, due to mining or excavation works nearby, trees nearby (causing the soil to lose moisture) or prolonged dry weather conditions
- Heave, where there is upward movement of the ground. This could be due to clay soil swelling when wet or the removal of nearby trees (which releases a large amount of water into the ground)
- Defective drainage
Diagnosing the cause of structural movement can be very complex.
How does cracking relate to the APC competencies?
Where a candidate has Building Pathology to level 3 in the RICS APC, such as for a Building Surveyor, you need to be following the trail, analysing the potential causes of the cracking and advising on the most likely cause or causes, alongside remedial works.
However, if you only have Inspection to level 3 (and no Building Pathology competency), e.g. as a Commercial Real Estate candidate, then you would not be expected to analyse a defect. You would instead be reporting what you saw (using comprehensive notes and photographs) and
recommending that your client seeks specialist advice.
You cannot simply be ignorant to the issue though – you need the requisite knowledge of construction and defects to be able to identify and provide diligent advice to your client. This is a common area of referral, particularly on the Inspection competency.
However, a candidate in this position should not seek to give in-depth advice on building pathology as this would be outside their scope of experience.
This all comes back to advising or acting within your scope of competence. Know what you should or not be advising on and how far you can go in giving advice (or recommending that a specialist provides that advice instead) is key to demonstrating competence.
How can I report on cracking?
For candidates with Building Pathology as a level 2 or 3 APC competency, you should keep detailed site notes and photographs of any cracking observed.
Cracks come in many forms:
- Hairline cracks
- Stepped cracks
- Vertical cracks
- Cracks that are wider at one end
- Horizontal cracks
- Cracks that mirror internally and externally
The type and nature of the crack is likely to give an indication of it’s cause. An excellent book to read is a Practical Guide to Diagnosing Structural Movement in Buildings by Malcolm Holland.
You should also record the position and direction of cracks on sketch diagrams or plans of the building elevations.
Physical inspection on site should include:
- Determining the approximate age of the cracks, e.g. are they clean or has dirt accumulated in the crack?
- Measuring the dimensions and configuration of the crack
- Recording the materials, finishes and condition of the building materials and wider construction
BRE Digest 251 Assessment of damage in low-rise buildings provides a helpful guide to assessing cracking to buildings. There are six categories, 0-5, based on the width of the cracking observed and with associated remedial advice:
- 0 – hairline cracks <0.1mm – negligible and no action required
- 1 – fine cracks up to 1mm – repaired through normal decoration
- 2 – cracks up to 5mm – easily filled or re-pointed and doors or windows eased and adjusted
- 3 – cracks of 5-15mm – may require opening up and patching or repointing
- 4 – extensive damage, cracks of 15-25mm – may require breaking out and replacing sections of masonry, particularly over windows or doors
- 5 – structural damage, cracks >25mm – likely to require partial or complete rebuilding
We would recommend purchasing a copy of the Digest from BRE, as it is essential reading and contains a lot of helpful detail and advice.
About the author
Jen Lemen BSc (Hons) FRICS
Jen has extensive experience in providing training services to students, RICS AssocRICS, APC and FRICS candidates and corporate clients, together with academic experience as a Senior Lecturer at the University of the West of England, Lecture at the University of Portsmouth and Associate Tutor at the University College of Estate Management. Her RICS assessment experience includes sitting on final APC interview panels, APC appeal panels and being a lead APC preliminary review assessor.
She has also written published articles in Property Week, ACES Terrier, RICS Modus and the RICS Property Journal. She also writes a regular APC column in Estates Gazette Brick & Mortar podcast series with Sarah Jackman and is a contributing author to the Health & Safety section on RICS iSurv.
Team Tales – December 2025
This month’s Team Tale is with our charismatic and ever-curious (some would say nosey!) Community & Engagement Manager, Carolyn Robins. Known for her love of people and ability to juggle partnerships, training and a glass of fizz with equal finesse, we’re diving into the person behind the role – and the spark that keeps our community thriving. Can you describe yourself in 10 words? Bubbly, inquisitive, fun, family-obsessed, fizz-loving, energetic, creative, organised(ish), supportive, curious.Tell us a little bit about yourself and your work background? I’ve always gravitated towards roles where people, partnerships and creativity sit at the heart of what I do. Before joining BI, I worked across a mix of community engagement, partner relations and training support, including my time...
Owner spotlight: Greater governance, visibility and audit trails
FastDraft’s 2025 Impact Survey shows that 93% of asset owners would recommend the platform to peers. Here’s how owners are gaining stronger governance, full oversight, and audit-ready records - all while saving time. Gaining full oversight and governance across contracts For asset owners, getting control of contract management right from the start of their projects is essential. According to King’s College London, 50% of adjudication cases in construction stem from poor contract administration . For asset owners, managing multiple contracts across a large portfolio is about much more than day-to-day admin. It’s about governance, traceability, and being confident that nothing slips through the cracks. Our 2025 Impact Survey found: 94% of owners save time every week using FastDraft 94% say...
Contractor spotlight: Why 96% would recommend FastDraft
FastDraft’s 2025 Impact Survey shows 96% of contractors would recommend the platform to peers to improve their construction contract management. Here’s why contractors are finding it easier to save time, stay ahead of deadlines, and keep audit-ready records. Saving hours each week on contract admin Contractors know the grind: scrolling through inboxes for critical notices, juggling multiple spreadsheets to track changes, or raising notices without standardised templates. Add in chasing delivery partners at crunch times, and it’s no wonder admin consumes hours that should be spent on delivery. FastDraft changes that. In our 2025 Impact Survey: 92% of contractors reported saving time each week with FastDraft Work that once took hours of manual effort now takes minutes thanks to structured...
